Local AI Advisor

Simple-Attention-Sparsification on local hardware

Estimated comfort for repository coding with Aider on a MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48GB.

Simple-Attention-Sparsification

tencent · See model card · 0 downloads

Hugging Face
Reasoning / thinking mode
Parameters
4.0B estimated
Context window
40K tokens
Attention
Standard (full attention)
Layers · KV heads · head dim
36 · 8 · 128
KV cache
144 KB/token · 4.5 GB at 32K
Tool calling
good (from chat template)
Thinking
good (from chat template)
Vision
basic (inferred — no supporting signal)
Commercial use
check cardCheck the model card
Import confidence
low · capabilities estimated

Weights by quantization

Q3_K_M

1.9 GB

computed · low confidence

Q4_K_M

2.3 GB

computed · low confidence

Q5_K_M

2.7 GB

computed · low confidence

Q6_K

3.2 GB

computed · low confidence

Q8_0

4.1 GB

computed · low confidence

F16 / BF16

7.7 GB

computed · low confidence

  • • Architecture read from Qwen/Qwen3-4B.
  • • Parameter count estimated from the architecture (the Hub reports none for this repo).
  • • Assumes GGUF / MLX conversions of this model exist (they do for most popular models). Sizes are computed from bits per weight.
  • • vision: basic, inferred from missing signals (low confidence).
  • • Capability ratings are estimated from model size and name — this model hasn't been assessed by hand.
  • • Commercial use unknown: Check the model card.

Simple-Attention-Sparsification — 8-bit

Borderline for your workload

Borderline

Speed

25–35 tok/s

Comfortable

Memory left

27 GB

of 48 GB

First word in

≈25 s

Comfortable

All the details
Your setup
MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48 GB
Workload
Repository coding with Aider
Runtime → tool
LM Studio → Aider
Memory used
9.6 GB
Context
32K · up to 32K practical
Tool support
Official
Use-case fit
Poorly suited

Why?

  • Model fits with approximately 27 GB of memory headroom.
  • LM Studio supports hardware acceleration on this machine (Metal (Apple GPU)).
  • Aider can connect to LM Studio (officially supported).
  • Generation (25–35 tok/s) should be appropriate for interactive coding.
  • Ingesting a prompt of 14K tokens takes ≈25 s; prompt processing keeps up with interactive coding.
  • 32K window; generation drops to 19–25 tok/s when it is full. KV cache is large (≈4.5 GB).
  • Weak coding capability for interactive coding.

Why “Borderline” rather than “Acceptable”?

  • Workload suitability: Weak coding capability for interactive coding.
  • Context: 32K window; generation drops to 19–25 tok/s when it is full. KV cache is large (≈4.5 GB).

How sure are we?

Medium confidence

Estimated from bandwidth and compute, calibrated against 2 verified benchmarks of other models on this same chip (measured with a different engine, so calibration is partial).

  • Calibrated with verified benchmarks of other models on this chip.
  • Some specifications come from lower-confidence sources.
Medium confidence
Check with your hardware and workload