Local AI Advisor

Qwen3.8-27B-NVFP4 on local hardware

Estimated comfort for repository coding with Aider on a MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48GB.

Qwen3.8-27B-NVFP4Open source

nvidia · apache-2.0 · 583,740 downloads

Hugging Face
VisionReasoning / thinking mode
Parameters
18B exact
Context window
256K tokens
Attention
Hybrid linear + full attention
Layers · KV heads · head dim
64 · 4 · 256
KV cache
64 KB/token · 2.0 GB at 32K
Tool calling
good (from chat template)
Thinking
good (from chat template)
Vision
good (from config)
Commercial use
allowedRetain the required license and attribution notices
Import confidence
medium · capabilities estimated

Weights by quantization

Q3_K_M

8.3 GB

computed · low confidence

Q4_K_M

10 GB

computed · low confidence

Q5_K_M

12 GB

computed · low confidence

Q6_K

14 GB

computed · low confidence

Q8_0

18 GB

computed · low confidence

F16 / BF16

34 GB

computed · low confidence

  • • Assumes GGUF / MLX conversions of this model exist (they do for most popular models). Sizes are computed from bits per weight.
  • • vision: good, inferred from config (low confidence).
  • • Capability ratings are estimated from model size and name — this model hasn't been assessed by hand.

Qwen3.8-27B-NVFP4 — 4-bit

Acceptable for your workload

Acceptable

Speed

15–20 tok/s

Adequate

Memory left

24 GB

of 48 GB

First word in

≈85 s

Slow

All the details
Your setup
MacBook Pro M4 Pro 48 GB
Workload
Repository coding with Aider
Runtime → tool
LM Studio → Aider
Memory used
13 GB
Context
32K · up to 128K practical
Tool support
Official
Use-case fit
Partly suited

Why?

  • Model fits with approximately 24 GB of memory headroom.
  • LM Studio supports hardware acceleration on this machine (Metal (Apple GPU)).
  • Aider can connect to LM Studio (officially supported).
  • Generation (15–20 tok/s) is adequate but not ideal for interactive coding.
  • 32K window; generation drops to 14–19 tok/s when it is full.
  • Weak coding capability for interactive coding.
  • Ingesting a prompt of 14K tokens takes ≈85 s and each step ≈80 s; across ~4 calls a task takes ≈7 min.

Why “Acceptable” rather than “Comfortable”?

  • Prompt processing: Ingesting the first prompt (14K tokens) takes ≈85 s; each of the ~4 follow-up turns takes ≈80 s (≈7 min per task).
  • Workload suitability: Weak coding capability for interactive coding.
  • Generation: Expected 15–20 tok/s at ~16K tokens of context. Coding with repository context is comfortable from about 28 tok/s.
  • Context: 32K window; generation drops to 14–19 tok/s when it is full.

How sure are we?

Medium confidence

Estimated from bandwidth and compute, calibrated against 2 verified benchmarks of other models on this same chip (measured with a different engine, so calibration is partial).

  • Calibrated with verified benchmarks of other models on this chip.
  • Hybrid/sliding attention performance varies more between runtimes.
Medium confidence
Check with your hardware and workload